God, Bush and "The West Wing"

I was warmly moved by episode 14 of The West Wing. Aethetically speaking, I was really taken by the uses of the Hebrew hymn at different places in the episode and what it meant for forgiveness. I enjoyed the rapid-fire dialogue and the tracking shots throughout the office, but I was reminded of some parodies of the show and thus found this technique humourous. In terms of writing, I thought the characters where developed very richly in terms of dialogue, especially by what name or title they chose to address each other. Lastly, I was shocked by the show’s success with delivering gripping monologues and talking about religion without being moralizing or condescending.

Being Catholic, I find this statement to be entirely consistent with my own experience. While I find the hegemonic nature of the Catholic Church to most of the time be a nurturing mother and trustworthy guide in moral and secular waters, quite frankly, they are sometimes just plain wrong and outdated. The scene where Jed is counseled by his priest, but acts independently of him is, I think, a perfect exposition of this. Personally, I think the Catholic Church should help to guide its members, but as Cardinal Newman said, “the first pope is your conscience.” Sometimes, declaration or age-old laws simply cannot grasp the complexity of the human experience day-in and day-out. In those times, a Catholic should act with the help of the Church, but also own their own will in accord with their conscience.

I think that a network could air The West Wing in post-9/11 America because the media gained the power to comment on and lead the zeitgeist. Americans grew increasingly bipolar in their attitudes toward the president and the government’s ability to lead a nation in the time of despair and to respond to a natural catastrophe. Basically, it finally became cool to criticize the government. I honestly cannot think of a modern TV programme that comments on Obama in the way that The West Wing comments on Bush. The only series I think comes close is the portrait of post-Katrina New Orleans as seen in David Simon’s Treme. New Orleans in Treme often conveys a hopeful portrait of some post-racial America.

Violence...For Real.

“Baghdad ER” was simply harrowing. But, aside from being compelling for 60 minutes, the documentary left me reflecting on the nature of violence in film. That sounds a bit lofty, I know, but I found myself looking away from parts of “Baghdad ER.” I’m not squeamish by any means. I love horror films and have seen some pretty intense violence and gore portrayed on screen, but few things as disturbing as the carnage portrayed in “Baghdad ER.”

What’s that about? My first hypothesis is that graphic violence in fiction is of a different nature than violence in non-fiction. That is to say, a horror film has different goals and tone than a documentary. Strings and strings of gratuitously gory horror sequels don’t disturb me, rather, they often amuse or thrill me. What’s the difference? Why is it okay to see a man’s penis eaten off by pirahna’s but so much harder to see a medical amputation of an I.E.D. victim?

Because the events of “Baghdad ER” are real. I think it’s that simple. When I watch Freddy Krueger dice horny teenagers in “Nightmare of Elm Street” I know I’m watching deliberately moralizing fiction. Obviously, there really isn’t a man in a sweater and hat that haunts kids in their dreams and kills them. On the other hand, when an Iraqi civilian looses his leg because of battle, I’m watching something that really happens. This man is not a character in a film devised for my amusement. He is real. This violence interrupted his own life and his scarred for it.

The most disquieting part of “Baghdad ER” that really drives home my point is when an American soldier dies on camera. Again, in countless horror films or Bond films, the body counts are in the triple digits and no one thinks twice about it. But, when one real person dies on camera, one feels dirty or perverse for having seen it, because of the nature of television as a medium of entertainment.

With that said, I think the discernable difference between fiction and non-fiction films that can entirely warp the viewing experience is the nature the film is serving. Is it to enlighten, to inspire, to entertain? Or is it to document? The two exist within the same medium, making it at once dangerous and undeniably powerful.

Commercial

Here is the link to my 30-sec commercial about Wikipedia:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXmb2EfaoRY

-tj

Just a Minute

Here is the link to my 1-minute movie:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYs8pndVL9s

-TJ

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vYs8pndVL9s?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vYs8pndVL9s?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

Bridging the GAPS in Commercials

TJ Keeley

On Commercials

A.     The advertising objective of the Gap was to inform its potential shoppers that the company was undergoing a makeover, or as they phrase it in the commercial “the all-new Gap is coming.” The commercial dramatized that the renovation was sparked by the customers and was thus a reaction to their desires, by literally showing them chaotically destroy an old Gap store.

B.     The commercial follows the basic three-act structure of a short film. I suppose the genre is silent comedy. The power in its form of communication is the way the violence and mayhem escalates into a sort of action film complete with its own score.

C.     Selling.

D.    National.

E.     The idea meant to be left in the audiences mind is that Gap is revamping its approach to style and advertising to meet the needs of and to respond to the demands of the customers.

F.     The commercial’s target audience were potential shoppers at Gap stores. Based on the director and tone of the film, I think they were shooting for a younger, hipper, crowd so to speak – maybe late teens and early twenties.

G.     The theme is that destruction is fun. The concept is literalizing a stores renovation and exaggerating it to epic proportions.

H.    The visual language is a frantic, action film complete with shaky camera work, and quick editing.

Damaging Acts

The first episode of the series Damages, is broken up into four acts that are separated by commercial breaks. Each of the acts ends with a beat, a semi-climactic moment where the plot twists or the momentum of the episode changes.

The episode begins with a pre-credits teaser. After the credits, the episode shifts back in time 6 months to tell the events leading up to what was seen in the teaser. This is the hook. Who is this woman? What is she running from? Where is she running to? Why is she bleeding? Who did this to her? All of these questions are unraveled throughout the episode.

The episode rewinds to her finding a job at a law firm. She really wants to work for Glenn Close, but rejects an interview because it interferes with her sister’s wedding. At the end of this act, Glenn Close dramatically shows up at the wedding and hires her anyway. This is the end of the act.

Another act climaxes around the time when the protagonist’s sister is being tormented and when the protagonist comes up with a theory for why she was hired. We are later told that theory was false, and her sister agrees to testify as the key witness. This beat acts as a counter to one’s which came before it. While we got suspense from thinking that maybe the protagonist was hired only to deliver her sister as the key witness, we are relieved when told otherwise.

The end of the episode marks the end of the final act. It is revealed that the protagonist’s suspicions were indeed accurate as to why she was hired. Though the episode wraps up everything that happened in that given time, telling us who the woman at the beginning was, what happened to her, and why she was running, it ends on a beat making us want more. It raises questions about Glenn Close’s character when it is revealed was terrorizing the protagonist’s sister to get her to talk.

Techniques of Drama in "The Wire"

I watched "The Immaculate Election" from ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT and "Backwash" from THE WIRE. But, given the assignment, I will discuss THE WIRE more at length.

I must admit from the get-go here that though The Wire is a truly incredible television show, I find it incredibly hard to analyze simply because there is so much going on – so many characters and story lines that last several episodes – that one often can’t fully appreciate it until many episodes later. With that said, here goes.

In the “Backwash” episode of The Wire, the main characters were Stringer Bell and Frank Sobatka. Most of the episode was told through their relative points-of-view (with the exception of a few scenes). Lt. Daniels was another main character in this episode, but the plot didn’t seem to deal as much with him as with the other two.

In one scene, much of the exposition about what the characters were thinking and feeling came out through glances. The scene was D’Angelo’s funeral. There is a lot more going on here plot-wise, but I’ll save the words. While one man sang at the funeral, the camera watched the looks exchanged between Horse Face and Stringer Bell and his people. This highlighted who knew what was really going on in regards to D’s death.

The mood and tone of the episode are bleak, but with a sort of cynicism. Some very dark things happen involving some very troubled and conflicted characters, but the episode maintains a very gallows sense of humour.

There were many ticking bombs in the episode, but one got a sense that they are still ticking on into future episodes.

The “big moment” occurred when one of Frank Sobotka’s men got severely injured on the docks. Frank spent much of the episode enraged that new technology was going to change the business his family grew up in and take jobs away from his sons, and this all climaxed when one of his men had his leg shattered by a box.